Preponderance of matter.
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:26 am
I have repeatedly been told that there was a "slight preponderance" of matter over antimatter after the big bang. This has always bothered me as I cannot see why that should be the case. Can we say we know, (if so, how), that, random example, the Coma cluster of galaxies does not glow as a result of antiHydrogen fusing to antiHelium? Silly example, but I'm sure you understand my thought process here.