Non-hazardous bacteria as a substitute for harmful bacteria?
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:46 pm
I'm planning on doing a microbiology experiment on testing of antimicrobial properties of certain substances. I can only use benign sources of bacteria in my experiments.
I was thinking of using E. Coli K12 since that is non-hazardous bacteria. However, I also thought of using lactobacillus acidophilus since (the bacteria in yogurt) since that might be easier to obtain and work with.
Before I perform the experiment, I'm interested in finding out if
1) what the difference between non-hazardous bacteria (such as E. coli) and more hazardous forms
2) how similiar lactobacillus acidophilus is to E. coli.
My concern is that I might not be able to generalize the results of this experiment to experiments with more harmful bacteria. That is, anti-microbial agents might leave the good bacteria untouched, but might actually prevent microbial growth of the "bad" bacteria. If this were the case, my experiment would not be applicable.
I was thinking of using E. Coli K12 since that is non-hazardous bacteria. However, I also thought of using lactobacillus acidophilus since (the bacteria in yogurt) since that might be easier to obtain and work with.
Before I perform the experiment, I'm interested in finding out if
1) what the difference between non-hazardous bacteria (such as E. coli) and more hazardous forms
2) how similiar lactobacillus acidophilus is to E. coli.
My concern is that I might not be able to generalize the results of this experiment to experiments with more harmful bacteria. That is, anti-microbial agents might leave the good bacteria untouched, but might actually prevent microbial growth of the "bad" bacteria. If this were the case, my experiment would not be applicable.