Rubber Band Can...
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 8:32 am
With so many types of rubber bands out on the market, I'm curious about the reason for that. I also want to know what makes one better than another. So, for my science project, I'm comparing the strength of rubber bands: 1) with the same length but a different width and 2) bands with the same width but a different length to see what makes the most difference. I've purchased rubber bands made by the same company, to control my variables as much as possible, and my test is being done indoors (at room temperature). To measure their strength, I'm suspending a rubber band from a cup hook screwed into the top of a doorway. A metal ring that can be opened/closed is being attached to the suspended band, and I'm hanging a bucket beneath, so that I can add weight. To test for strength, I'm adding coins to the bucket, to see how much each type of band can bear before breaking, and I'm recording the weight of each bucket load (bucket and attached metal ring included) on a digital kitchen scale. I'm repeating the test three times for each type of rubber band, to get an average. I've seen other projects, where students were testing rubber bands; they were testing the impact of temperature on theirs, and they recorded the weight each band could bear, but they also made a point to measure the length of their rubber bands at the breaking point. My first question is this: Is the measurement of each band's stretched length necessary in my experiment? Second, I've noticed that others have used Hooke's law---which is very complicated!---with their experiments, but rubber is supposed to be a "non-hookean" substance. Am I supposed to incorporate that law (and formula) into mine? Finally, is testing the strength of rubber bands the same thing as testing elasticity? I'm assuming it is not.
Alex
Alex