Understanding the General AMBER forcefield
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:53 pm
Hello! I am trying to understand the General Amber Force Field (GAFF) located at http://archive.ambermd.org/201111/att-0689/gaff.dat. The gaff.dat file doesn't come with much documentation, so I have several questions to ask!
In OpenBabel, torsion terms seem to be defined in the format (excerpt):
X -c -c -X 4 1.200 180.000 2.000
X -c -c1-X 2 0.000 180.000 2.000
X -c -cg-X 2 0.000 180.000 2.000 same as X-c-c1-X
X -c -ch-X 2 0.000 180.000 2.000
X -c -c2-X 4 8.700 180.000 2.000 intrpol.bsd.on C6H6
Where the first column are the 4 atoms in the torsion chain.
1. OpenBabel computes some value vn_half by dividing the third column by the second column, then converting to Kilojoules. This is out of curiosity, but what values do the second and third columns represent?
Also, as I move down the list of torsions I get to a line break and see the format change slightly (excerpt):
X -o -c -o 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -X -c -o 10.5 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -X -ca-ha 1.1 180. 2. bsd.on C6H6 nmodes
X -X -n -hn 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -X -n2-hn 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -X -na-hn 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -c3-n -c3 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
2. Are these the improper torsion definitions?
Furthermore, I noticed that there are duplicate atom-groups with different params (excerpt):
c3-c3-c3-c3 1 0.18 0.0 -3. Junmei et al, 1999
c3-c3-c3-c3 1 0.25 180.0 -2. Junmei et al, 1999
c3-c3-c3-c3 1 0.20 180.0 1. Junmei et al, 1999
When given a torsion with 4 c3 molecules, how do I know which one to use?
Thanks!
- Eric
In OpenBabel, torsion terms seem to be defined in the format (excerpt):
X -c -c -X 4 1.200 180.000 2.000
X -c -c1-X 2 0.000 180.000 2.000
X -c -cg-X 2 0.000 180.000 2.000 same as X-c-c1-X
X -c -ch-X 2 0.000 180.000 2.000
X -c -c2-X 4 8.700 180.000 2.000 intrpol.bsd.on C6H6
Where the first column are the 4 atoms in the torsion chain.
1. OpenBabel computes some value vn_half by dividing the third column by the second column, then converting to Kilojoules. This is out of curiosity, but what values do the second and third columns represent?
Also, as I move down the list of torsions I get to a line break and see the format change slightly (excerpt):
X -o -c -o 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -X -c -o 10.5 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -X -ca-ha 1.1 180. 2. bsd.on C6H6 nmodes
X -X -n -hn 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -X -n2-hn 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -X -na-hn 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
X -c3-n -c3 1.1 180. 2. JCC,7,(1986),230
2. Are these the improper torsion definitions?
Furthermore, I noticed that there are duplicate atom-groups with different params (excerpt):
c3-c3-c3-c3 1 0.18 0.0 -3. Junmei et al, 1999
c3-c3-c3-c3 1 0.25 180.0 -2. Junmei et al, 1999
c3-c3-c3-c3 1 0.20 180.0 1. Junmei et al, 1999
When given a torsion with 4 c3 molecules, how do I know which one to use?
Thanks!
- Eric