Which method for ascorbic acid
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 11:37 pm
Hi, I am doing a post harvest biochemistry experiment that involves measuring ascorbic acid content in fruit juices. I have researched several inexpensive and relatively simple spectrophotometric/colorimetric methods (I don't want to use a titration). However, I don't know which one to pick nor have the resources/time to try and compare them all. I do want to pick the one that would give the most statistically accurate results with the least interference and was hoping you could give me an opinion. The methods are as follows:
A. Direct spectrophotometric method measuring absorbance at 266 nm. Interferences include: Iron(II), copper(II), magnesium(II), manganese(II), zinc(II), Nickel(II), citric acid, tartaric acid, benzoate. For details see (http://www.ijens.org/Vol%2011%20I%2002/ ... -IJENS.pdf)
B. DCIP- a blue dye, pink in acidic solution that when reduced by ascorbic acid becomes colorless. Reduction of DCIP is not limited to L-ascorbic acid, and any reducing substance present in the sample can reduce the dye. Substances that can interfere include cuprous, ferrous, and stannous ions, sulfite, thiosulfate, tannins, betanin, cysteine, glutathione.
c. Iodine/Starch method - oxidation reduction reaction so basically the same interferences as DCIP, though a little cheaper and possibly easier to detect
Its hard to compare these methods simply looking at different papers. With so much interference from metals in all methods I was thinking a chelating agent (EDTA) might also be useful (see http://www.mendeley.com/research/spectr ... e-to-iron/)
Thanks
A. Direct spectrophotometric method measuring absorbance at 266 nm. Interferences include: Iron(II), copper(II), magnesium(II), manganese(II), zinc(II), Nickel(II), citric acid, tartaric acid, benzoate. For details see (http://www.ijens.org/Vol%2011%20I%2002/ ... -IJENS.pdf)
B. DCIP- a blue dye, pink in acidic solution that when reduced by ascorbic acid becomes colorless. Reduction of DCIP is not limited to L-ascorbic acid, and any reducing substance present in the sample can reduce the dye. Substances that can interfere include cuprous, ferrous, and stannous ions, sulfite, thiosulfate, tannins, betanin, cysteine, glutathione.
c. Iodine/Starch method - oxidation reduction reaction so basically the same interferences as DCIP, though a little cheaper and possibly easier to detect
Its hard to compare these methods simply looking at different papers. With so much interference from metals in all methods I was thinking a chelating agent (EDTA) might also be useful (see http://www.mendeley.com/research/spectr ... e-to-iron/)
Thanks