single human subject--good science or not?
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2004 9:39 am
This is for a 3rd grade project, so technical expectations aren't so high. But I want to know if this is good science. My son has a cousin who is profoundly deaf from birth; she has heard nothing in 6 years. She just received a cochlear implant which is based on sending radio transmission through the cochlea and along nerves to the brain. The brain then learns to recognize these impulses as sounds. My son questions whether she will actually hear when they "turn her ears on" and if she will automatically hear everything. So we thought we would offer her some common sounds at "turn on" and count how many she recognizes initially. Then we will return at 2 more intervals to see how many of the sounds she recognizes over time. His hypothesis is that she will recognize all sounds at turn on or that she will recognize different sounds at different rates.
Is it okay to use a single human subject for this purpose? Or does this need more tweaking? The fact that she heard nothing at all before serves as a control, I think. The variables that exist in the real world are that each recipient is truly different. Each has a different mental ability to "learn" the sounds. Some have had some hearing prior to implant, so there is already sound development. It is a given, though, that all sounds are learned at a different rate. Example, music is a very complex sound and takes longer to "master" and enjoy than simpler sounds.
What do you think? Thanks
Is it okay to use a single human subject for this purpose? Or does this need more tweaking? The fact that she heard nothing at all before serves as a control, I think. The variables that exist in the real world are that each recipient is truly different. Each has a different mental ability to "learn" the sounds. Some have had some hearing prior to implant, so there is already sound development. It is a given, though, that all sounds are learned at a different rate. Example, music is a very complex sound and takes longer to "master" and enjoy than simpler sounds.
What do you think? Thanks