contradiction in research
Moderators: AmyCowen, kgudger, bfinio, MadelineB, Moderators
-
milewsal
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 6:35 pm
- Occupation: student
- Project Question: cooking chemistry.........using iodine to see which cooking oils contain the greatest amounts of unsaturated fat/ saturated fat
- Project Due Date: January 18
- Project Status: I am just starting
contradiction in research
while researching for my background essay i found a contradiction....in an encyclopedia at the library it stated that double bonds are weaker than single bonds, but on Grolier online it stated that triple bonds are stronger than double bonds and double bonds are stronger than single bonds. Which one is true and is what i want to discuss in my paper?
-
kgudger
- Moderator
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:20 pm
- Occupation: electronic engineer
- Project Question: n/a
- Project Due Date: n/a
- Project Status: Not applicable
Re: contradiction in research
Hi - I just checked "Prentice Hall Chemistry, California", Wilbraham, Staley, Matta & Waterman, 2007, and it has this to say:
Keith
You can see the trend here. For more information I would use your search engine to look at bond dissociation energies.A large bond dissociation energy corresponds to a strong covalent bond. A typical carbon-carbon single bond has a bond dissociation energy of 347 kJ/mol. Typical carbon-carbon double and triple bonds have bond dissociation energies of 657 kJ/mol and 908 kJ/mol, respectively.
Keith
-
deleted-71588
- Former Expert
- Posts: 1297
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 11:47 am
Re: contradiction in research
The previous answer is for carbon to carbon bonds. For other double/single bonds, like O=C=O, O=CH2, vs HO-CH2, the opposite is likely true. As the previous responder stated, you will have to look up the disassociation energies for the specific bonds you are interested in.
-Craig

