Hie,
I did the project titled 'Measuring Sugar Content of a Liquid with a Laser Pointer' (https://www.sciencebuddies.org/science ... &from=TSW) and made it to the regionals with fantastic setup, results and presentation. Now I require the exact derivation of the formula which uses the apex angle of the prism, refractive index of air, and the angle of minimum deviation to calculate the refractive index of the solution tested.
I am aware it came from the Fermat's Refraction Law/Principle.
The Regional fair is being held on April 1st, 2011.
Thanks alot,
Jivy
Derivation Of The Fermat's Law Formula?
Moderators: kgudger, bfinio, MadelineB, Moderators
-
deleted-64204
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 7:48 am
- Occupation: Student Grade 11th
- Project Question: I did the project titled 'Measuring Sugar Content of a Liquid with a Laser Pointer' and I made it to the regionals. I have an inquiry about the derivation of the the formula that uses the apex angle of the prism, refractive index of air, and angle of minimum deviation to calculate the refractive index. I am aware that the formula has been derived from Fermat's Law/Principle and Refraction and can also lead to Snell's Law but I have been unsuccessful finding the exact derivation.
- Project Due Date: April 1st, 2011
- Project Status: I am finished with my experiment and analyzing the data
-
deleted-71417
- Former Expert
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:24 am
Re: Derivation Of The Fermat's Law Formula?
Ho,
Here is an algebraic argument proving Fermat’s Principle:
http://www.maths.bris.ac.uk/~mahah/Noncalculus.pdf
The more customary proof is based on the Calculus of Variations, a discussion of which is here:
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/HancEulerEJP.pdf
http://www.physics.miami.edu/~nearing/m ... tional.pdf
You might be interested in these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_o ... _principle
http://www.math.wayne.edu/~isaksen/Expository/dogs.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_p ... Derivation
If you can understand the Calculus of Variations approach you will find it helpful, as variation principles permeate the study of physics (look into Hamiltonisn and Lagrange formulations), but this is pretty advanced stuff for high school.
Good luck and best regards,
Barrett L Tomlinson
Here is an algebraic argument proving Fermat’s Principle:
http://www.maths.bris.ac.uk/~mahah/Noncalculus.pdf
The more customary proof is based on the Calculus of Variations, a discussion of which is here:
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/HancEulerEJP.pdf
http://www.physics.miami.edu/~nearing/m ... tional.pdf
You might be interested in these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus_o ... _principle
http://www.math.wayne.edu/~isaksen/Expository/dogs.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_p ... Derivation
If you can understand the Calculus of Variations approach you will find it helpful, as variation principles permeate the study of physics (look into Hamiltonisn and Lagrange formulations), but this is pretty advanced stuff for high school.
Good luck and best regards,
Barrett L Tomlinson

