|
Keywords and Concepts
|
Lists a few project-specific keywords and concepts with minimal relevance to the project.
|
Identifies some relevant project-specific keywords and concepts but may miss key terms.
|
Identifies most of the key project-specific keywords and concepts relevant to the project.
|
Identifies all key project-specific keywords and concepts, demonstrating a deep understanding of the project.
|
Select:
Notes:
|
|
Background Research Questions
|
Develops 1-2 research questions using the question words table with limited relevance and depth.
|
Develops 3-4 research questions using the question words table, with moderate relevance and some depth.
|
Develops 5-6 well-crafted research questions using the question words table, showing good relevance and depth.
|
Develops more than 6 insightful and highly relevant research questions using the question words table, showing excellent relevance and depth.
|
Select:
Notes:
|
|
Identifying Sources
|
Finds 1-2 general sources of information, but their reliability is questionable
|
Finds 3-4 general sources of information with moderate reliability. The assessment of reliability is somewhat correct.
|
Finds 5-6 reliable general sources of information relevant to the background research. The assessment of reliability is correct.
|
Finds more than 6 highly reliable and relevant general sources of information for background research. The assessment of reliability is correct and thorough.
|
Select:
Notes:
|
|
Bibliography Formatting and Order
|
Uses incorrect or inconsistent citation style with many formatting errors. Sources are not in alphabetical order
|
Attempts MLA or APA style but with several errors. Sources are partially in alphabetical order.
|
Consistently uses MLA or APA style with few to no errors. Sources are in alphabetical order.
|
Flawlessly uses MLA or APA style with no errors. Sources are in alphabetical order.
|
Select:
Notes:
|
|
Research Paper Content and Summary (if assigned)
|
Provides a basic summary of learning with significant gaps and lacks depth. The content is disorganized and unclear.
|
Provides a general summary of learning with some gaps in information. The content is somewhat organized but may lack clarity and coherence
|
Provides a clear and detailed summary of learning, covering all key points. The content is well-organized and coherent.
|
Provides a comprehensive and insightful summary of learning, thoroughly covering all key points with depth and clarity. The content is excellently organized and highly coherent.
|
Select:
Notes:
|
|
Research Paper In-Text Citations (if assigned)
|
Uses few or no in-text citations, or citations are incorrectly formatted and placed.
|
Uses some in-text citations with several formatting errors and inconsistencies. Citations are sometimes misplaced or incomplete.
|
Uses in-text citations correctly with minor errors. Citations are properly formatted and placed to support the content.
|
Uses in-text citations flawlessly, with correct formatting and placement. Citations effectively support the content and enhance the paper’s credibility
|
Select:
Notes:
|