Hello Science Buddies staff,
Although I am preparing to compete in the regional science fair in my state, I hope to use this same topic to enter in the more advanced science competitions, such as Intel STS, Intel ISEF, and Siemens. I have an idea, but in order to execute it, I would need a piece of equipment that is not available in the lab I am working at.
My question is this: If you can present your idea in a convincing manner, is data necessary? I know that it is extremely beneficial to back up claims, but for the regional-level science fairs, will I not make the cut without it?
When I continue my work for Intel/Siemens, I will definitely look into finding another lab in my area that does have the equipment, but I know that there are some regional science fair winners that did have inconclusive/minimal data...
Will the judges understand? Please keep in mind that I am asking this for the regional-level. For national competitions, I will most definitely find ways to obtain the equipment.
Thank you so much!
A need for data?
Moderators: AmyCowen, kgudger, bfinio, MadelineB, Moderators
-
staryl13
- Former Expert
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:27 pm
- Occupation: Research Assistant
- Project Question: Neuroregeneration
- Project Due Date: N/A
- Project Status: Not applicable
Re: A need for data?
Hi,
Having entered projects in various science competitions when I was in high school, I can tell you from experience that the ability to explain your project effectively is just as important as having data. It really depends on the judges that you get, but for the most part, you must have some sort of data and data analysis in addition to your great project ideas in order to advance to higher levels of the competitions. I would say that you should definitely keep trying to get that piece of equipment, and perhaps you could try emailing local university professors if they have that piece of equipment and if you could use it for your project. Another option I would suggest is tweaking your project idea so that perhaps you can conduct your project with some more easily obtainable equipment. This would be analogous to splitting your larger goal into a set of smaller, more achievable goals. The reason behind this is that if judges see that you actively tried to conduct your experiment with what you had (even at least a small part of it), you will be able to get some sort of data and still be able to tell the judges at the end of the presentation that what you really hope to do in the future is to expand the project by using the original equipment that you were not able to obtain. Again, like you said, with regional science fairs it will be a hit-or-miss depending on the variability of the judges and the judging criteria, so your best bet would be to get as much of an edge as possible - which includes getting as much data as you possibly can. Hope this helps!
Having entered projects in various science competitions when I was in high school, I can tell you from experience that the ability to explain your project effectively is just as important as having data. It really depends on the judges that you get, but for the most part, you must have some sort of data and data analysis in addition to your great project ideas in order to advance to higher levels of the competitions. I would say that you should definitely keep trying to get that piece of equipment, and perhaps you could try emailing local university professors if they have that piece of equipment and if you could use it for your project. Another option I would suggest is tweaking your project idea so that perhaps you can conduct your project with some more easily obtainable equipment. This would be analogous to splitting your larger goal into a set of smaller, more achievable goals. The reason behind this is that if judges see that you actively tried to conduct your experiment with what you had (even at least a small part of it), you will be able to get some sort of data and still be able to tell the judges at the end of the presentation that what you really hope to do in the future is to expand the project by using the original equipment that you were not able to obtain. Again, like you said, with regional science fairs it will be a hit-or-miss depending on the variability of the judges and the judging criteria, so your best bet would be to get as much of an edge as possible - which includes getting as much data as you possibly can. Hope this helps!
"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -Isaac Asimov