Measuring the Speed of Moving Objects with Stroboscopic Phot
Moderators: kgudger, bfinio, MadelineB, Moderators
-
kyla_nikole1020
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:34 am
- Occupation: student
- Project Question: I came to ask questions.
- Project Due Date: march 22
- Project Status: I am conducting my research
Measuring the Speed of Moving Objects with Stroboscopic Phot
I need help with materials. Should I purchase a strobe light or a photography strobe light? Please reply! Thanks
-
theborg
- Moderator
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:26 pm
- Occupation: Space Test Analyst
- Project Question: "To explain all nature is too difficult a task for any one man. 'Tis much better to do a little with certainty and leave the rest for others that come after you, than to explain all things by conjecture without making sure of anything." - Sir Isaac Newton
- Project Due Date: N/A
- Project Status: Not applicable
Re: Measuring the Speed of Moving Objects with Stroboscopic
kyla_nikole1020,
Thank you for your question and welcome to science buddies. The answer to your question depends on what and how exactly you are looking to measure. If you are looking to use photography to "catch" multiple images of an object in motion and then try to back out the velocity of the object, then you need to ensure your camera shutter is in sync with the strobe. If they aren't then you will have issues where the shutter could be partially or fully closed when the strobe flash is activated and open when the strobe is not, causing your images to be dark. For this purpose, you may need something a bit more sophisticated than any old strobe light, which may drive you to a speciallized photography strobe. But if you are looking to "slow or freeze" the motion of something that is moving in a repeating patern with a certain frequency, like a wheel turning or a leaver moving up and down, then a regular (i.e. cheep) strobe could work. Again, trying to take pictures whithout a direct sync with the shutter could be difficult. If you were to use video instead, you may be able to, with lots of trial and error, be able to manually dial in the shutter speed and frame rate to sync with the a strobe light, but I've never tried anything like this and am not sure how possible it is.
bottom line: The above comprises some thoughts and ideas for your consideration. However, photography strobe lights can be quite pricy, so I don't want to steer you toward one of those without properly understanding your project. If you could provide some greater detail of your experiment and associated procedures, then we should be able to provide some better advice specific to your needs.
Thank you for your question and welcome to science buddies. The answer to your question depends on what and how exactly you are looking to measure. If you are looking to use photography to "catch" multiple images of an object in motion and then try to back out the velocity of the object, then you need to ensure your camera shutter is in sync with the strobe. If they aren't then you will have issues where the shutter could be partially or fully closed when the strobe flash is activated and open when the strobe is not, causing your images to be dark. For this purpose, you may need something a bit more sophisticated than any old strobe light, which may drive you to a speciallized photography strobe. But if you are looking to "slow or freeze" the motion of something that is moving in a repeating patern with a certain frequency, like a wheel turning or a leaver moving up and down, then a regular (i.e. cheep) strobe could work. Again, trying to take pictures whithout a direct sync with the shutter could be difficult. If you were to use video instead, you may be able to, with lots of trial and error, be able to manually dial in the shutter speed and frame rate to sync with the a strobe light, but I've never tried anything like this and am not sure how possible it is.
bottom line: The above comprises some thoughts and ideas for your consideration. However, photography strobe lights can be quite pricy, so I don't want to steer you toward one of those without properly understanding your project. If you could provide some greater detail of your experiment and associated procedures, then we should be able to provide some better advice specific to your needs.
Hope this helps.
theborg
----------
Science Buddies science fair guide:
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project_guide_index.shtml
Science Buddies project ideas:
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project_ideas.shtml
theborg
----------
Science Buddies science fair guide:
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project_guide_index.shtml
Science Buddies project ideas:
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project_ideas.shtml
-
Craig_Bridge
- Former Expert
- Posts: 1297
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 11:47 am
Re: Measuring the Speed of Moving Objects with Stroboscopic
How short an interval are you trying to sample at? If 30 frames per second is sufficient, then a video camera is a better choice than strobes.
If you are trying to sample at higher rates, then you could use a strobe that will flash at your desired sample rate. I don't know of any strobes designed for photography that are capable of recovering in less than 1/60th of a second and many of the ones designed for digital cameras have some pre-flashes at lower intensity for automatic exposure control which render them useless for this kind of an experiment using multiple delayed strobes. The problem with using a long shutter speed and a high speed strobes is that you may not be able to tell which image is associated with which strobe pulse if an object bounces and returns on the same path.
If you are trying to sample at higher rates, then you could use a strobe that will flash at your desired sample rate. I don't know of any strobes designed for photography that are capable of recovering in less than 1/60th of a second and many of the ones designed for digital cameras have some pre-flashes at lower intensity for automatic exposure control which render them useless for this kind of an experiment using multiple delayed strobes. The problem with using a long shutter speed and a high speed strobes is that you may not be able to tell which image is associated with which strobe pulse if an object bounces and returns on the same path.
-Craig
-
debra123
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:21 pm
- Occupation: Special Education Teacher.
- Project Question: I love to have discussion on Science.
- Project Due Date: Looking forward for a project.
- Project Status: I am just starting
Re: Measuring the Speed of Moving Objects with Stroboscopic
kyla_nikole1020 wrote:I need help with materials. Should I purchase a strobe light or a photography strobe light? Please reply! Thanks
This article details construction of a control circuit that can drive an array of LEDs for use as a stroboscope. The LED array can be made by straightforward modification of inexpensive LED flashlights, or a custom array can be built.
Code: Select all
http://www.instructables.com/id/Stop-Time-with-an-LED-Stroboscope/-
HowardE
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 1:35 pm
- Occupation: Science Buddies content developer
- Project Question: N/A
- Project Due Date: N/A
- Project Status: Not applicable
Re: Measuring the Speed of Moving Objects with Stroboscopic
That is a *spectacular* instructable. I wasn't familiar with it but it's well designed and extremely well described. While you could buy an inexpensive strobe light and perform the experiment as described, building that strobe out of recycled LED flashlights would be a joy in itself.
As the other responses said, a photographic strobe won't do what you need. A settable strobe of almost any kind will work - you'll probably find that one with a trigger input is far more versatile and will let you explore more amazing strobe photos like "Doc" Edgerton's famous http://edgerton-digital-collections.org ... e-nc-64002 or http://webmuseum.mit.edu/images/DIAmed/ ... 7001.L.jpg . The first one of course would require assistance from someone completely familiar with the use of a gun, but you could also get a strobe image of something breaking by pricking a water balloon.
As the other responses said, a photographic strobe won't do what you need. A settable strobe of almost any kind will work - you'll probably find that one with a trigger input is far more versatile and will let you explore more amazing strobe photos like "Doc" Edgerton's famous http://edgerton-digital-collections.org ... e-nc-64002 or http://webmuseum.mit.edu/images/DIAmed/ ... 7001.L.jpg . The first one of course would require assistance from someone completely familiar with the use of a gun, but you could also get a strobe image of something breaking by pricking a water balloon.
